From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 05 05:29:46 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 05 Sep 2005 05:29:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ECG6c-0007mp-8k
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 05:29:46 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.203])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ECG6X-0007mi-8j
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 05:29:46 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so408753wra
        for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 05:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=Jv1mEX9Fc181ohkj5U1ZhikxhuLfEuivhnbCsEV0zo4gZrHfdTl5OKP0Uc6SzlziVreGxlZFS47IasONMC476OdJuvIX7yCw6gqDPK66vgcEM9Ca33EknRZqSbIl8cF9SkC2/ifOssjzWBe9yFNv7TyIJKRIIM2J9k3kizkl0qw=
Received: by 10.54.26.52 with SMTP id 52mr3677555wrz;
        Mon, 05 Sep 2005 05:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.66.7 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 05:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d175605090505294021a848@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 09:29:34 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Another Newbie Intro
In-Reply-To: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C8AC@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_5603_8726638.1125923374260"
References: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C8AC@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 1948
X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

------=_Part_5603_8726638.1125923374260
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On 9/5/05, Newton, Philip <Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de> wrote:

>=20
> Yes - .e connects sumti, so you could say {coi la nei,omis .e rodo} but=
=20
> not
> {coi la nei,omis .e coi rodo} since {coi rodo} is not a sumti.
>=20
> I would've left out {la} after COI and would've said {coi .nei,omis. .e=
=20
> rodo
> .i mi'e .skat.}, but leaving in the {la} is not wrong.

  Actually, in this case you do need the {la}, for the same=20
reason you give above. {neiomis} by itself is not a sumti.
 mu'o mi'e xorxes

------=_Part_5603_8726638.1125923374260
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><br>
<div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 9/5/05, <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">N=
ewton, Philip</b> &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de">Phil=
ip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de</a>&gt; wrote:</span></div>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; M=
ARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br>Yes - .e connect=
s sumti, so you could say {coi la nei,omis .e rodo} but not<br>{coi la nei,=
omis .e coi rodo} since {coi rodo} is not a sumti.
<br><br>I would've left out {la} after COI and would've said {coi .nei,omis=
. .e rodo<br>.i mi'e .skat.}, but leaving in the {la} is not wrong.</blockq=
uote>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Actually, in this case you do need the {la}, for the same&nbsp;</div>
<div>reason you give above. {neiomis} by itself is not a sumti.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>mu'o mi'e xorxes</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>

------=_Part_5603_8726638.1125923374260--