From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 05 06:43:44 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 05 Sep 2005 06:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ECHGC-0000Vf-CU
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 06:43:44 -0700
Received: from mailgw5.gedas.de ([139.1.44.13])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1ECHG9-0000VX-Mr
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 06:43:44 -0700
Received: from mailgw5.gedas.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j85DheSh002393
	for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:43:40 +0200
Received: from GDDEBESAPP004.de.gedas-grp (gddebesapp004.de.gedas-grp [10.242.64.42])
	by mailgw5.gedas.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j85Dhcd6002385
	for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:43:40 +0200
Received: from blnsem08.de.gedas-grp ([139.1.84.54]) by GDDEBESAPP004.de.gedas-grp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
	 Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:43:38 +0200
Received: by blnsem08.de.gedas-grp with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <Q02JMAYH>; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:43:38 +0200
Message-ID: <A48849B31C98424CBB31A5E6C7D091E60230C8B2@wobsem03.de.gedas-grp>
From: "Newton, Philip" <Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de>
To: "'lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org'"
	 <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Another Newbie Intro
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:43:36 +0200 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2005 13:43:38.0542 (UTC) FILETIME=[D1E9D4E0:01C5B21F]
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 1956
X-Approved-By: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: Philip.Newton@gedas-onsite.de
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

> I think what Scott wants there is {gi'e}, which is the
> type of "and" that connects bridis together. But does a
> vocative phrase stand in for a complete bridi?

No.

> If not, how can he use some form of "and" in this case?

I'd just put the two next to one another: {coi .nei,omis. do'u coi rodo do'u
mi'e .skat.}.

Though then you'd need the terminator {do'u} if you want them to be next to
one another rather than have the second be part of the first etc.

I don't know whether there's an explicit co-ordinator that can be used here.

mu'o mi'e .filip.