From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 05 08:08:18 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 05 Sep 2005 08:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ECIa1-0001tk-SR for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 08:08:18 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1ECIZy-0001tc-EN for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 08:08:17 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so530015wri for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 08:08:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=uPvloNPO/RpgP2nznLtk28xwGhiQmTV0o33kxRspCVW6Rs4CultzVSH/lJCst0PD9z9F4k+VHUimOhd9etVUFlP7rghPB8yy/HUZIHHz3a5n7jfN/JtVd61WplHVoa+qCc4DXifWX7svsNoO5p1EYWvjWcyl7to7Zv7ULhjZkY8= Received: by 10.54.83.10 with SMTP id g10mr3746368wrb; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 08:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.140.6 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 08:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 11:08:12 -0400 From: Matt Arnold To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Constructed Languages 2 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7700_33315625.1125932892569" References: X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 1961 X-Approved-By: matt.mattarn@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_7700_33315625.1125932892569 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I prefer to think of them as variants and spinoffs, just as the ancestor of= =20 Lojban is Loglan. Nobody has a patent on the concept of a logical language.= =20 In fact, that was the struggle which Lojban went through in the early days= =20 when John Cooke Brown said he had a patent on it. -epkat On 9/5/05, Naomi K wrote: >=20 > Heyaz again... > -gau!spi, Txeqli, Lojsk...Lojban copycats?! What's up with those?=20 > (ahh...It's times like these I could use an attitudinal but I haven't lea= rnt=20 > them yet X-P) >=20 > mi'e .nei,omis. > ------=_Part_7700_33315625.1125932892569 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I prefer to think of them as variants and spinoffs, just as the ancestor of Lojban is Loglan. Nobody has a patent on the concept of a logical language. In fact, that was the struggle which Lojban went through in the early days when John Cooke Brown said he had a patent on it.
-epkat

On 9/5/05, Naomi K <alien.juxtaposition@gmail.com> wrote:
Heyaz again...
-gau!spi, Txeqli, Lojsk...Lojban copycats?! What's up with those? (ahh...It's times like these I could use an attitudinal but I haven't learnt them yet X-P)

mi'e .nei,omis.

------=_Part_7700_33315625.1125932892569--