From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Sep 06 07:04:54 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 06 Sep 2005 07:04:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ECe4E-0000FW-C4 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 07:04:54 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1ECe4B-0000FL-An for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 07:04:54 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 13so799346nzp for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 07:04:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=k3btZyJIkWXm2OLttjrQX3+wvNTD8ahtBHcVk4JcQ/oGJ8rn/OjND3VhSa4KJhjutiwuxmsDroFb0/REMmPQcAzopUo7ItcZr+JtbvrQPoNMoDwvZsdnYTS1kVF5kYgp5xRkluG2hpUyccaI2fI1+LQpgFsgKvGC95dHbeicqtg= Received: by 10.36.20.7 with SMTP id 7mr5708198nzt; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 07:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.222.64 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 07:04:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3df92a05090607043713d716@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 16:04:48 +0200 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: On Constructed Languages In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_11025_2494435.1126015488216" References: X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 1985 X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_11025_2494435.1126015488216 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline >=20 > What do you Lojbanists think of the other artificial languages? We Lojbanists? (Here I realized that the letter was not for me.) .uisai doi .uirik. I also find people very unbelieving when they hear of something new or just= =20 a bit radical... or logical! "...based on formal logic? What kind of sillyness is that?!" And that's=20 quite all they can and want to say. mi'e .xili,odor. ------=_Part_11025_2494435.1126015488216 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
What do you Lojbanists think of = the other artificial languages?
We Lojbanists? (Here I realized that the letter was not for me.) .uisa= i
 
doi .uirik.
I also find people very unbelieving when they hear of something n= ew or just a bit radical... or logical!
"...based on formal logic? What kind of sillyness is that?!"= And that's quite all they can and want to say.
 
mi'e .xili,odor.
------=_Part_11025_2494435.1126015488216--