From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Sep 21 12:34:07 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EIAM3-0000vG-8V
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:34:07 -0700
Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com ([195.54.107.73])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EIALu-0000uu-FS
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:34:07 -0700
Received: from [85.226.145.145] ([85.226.145.145] [85.226.145.145])
          by mxfep02.bredband.com with ESMTP
          id <20050921193351.EOOA3281.mxfep02.bredband.com@[85.226.145.145]>
          for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>;
          Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:33:51 +0200
Message-ID: <4331B3B6.8040903@handgranat.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:25:42 +0200
From: Sunnan <sunnan@handgranat.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] using ko  with xamgu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 2208
X-Approved-By: sunnan@handgranat.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-original-sender: sunnan@handgranat.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

Is using ko with xamgu controversial? For example, is {ko selxau lo 
ckafi} an acceptable way to say "Enjoy your coffee"?

ki'esaimi'e snan