From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Nov 10 20:00:29 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:07:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EaQ5V-0007q4-9Y
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:00:29 -0800
Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.194])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EaQ5T-0007px-Kp
	for lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:00:28 -0800
Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v1so579470nzb
        for <lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:00:26 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
        b=YWV59kC7VY7k8knAMbMqljGndRkipRBu6OR06JnkohytgzpWK2nEjfLzAmikrQmZhistHJ3VNPrrEujmh72Qh8hgL+YuW+9VGkeWIIXuSwvidFK9IyQQIHnVOgLqqsac7bfx23ICv3fplRj3etTqeEWMY1OSjyxwZ1esFTHUWOA=
Received: by 10.65.233.8 with SMTP id k8mr1835269qbr;
        Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:00:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.20.15 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:00:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <c164bd120511102000oe48242age7c75ef89106ec64@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 20:00:26 -0800
From: Benjamin Cook <selylacbes@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@chain.digitalkingdom.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Viva il parlare Lojban
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 2549
X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: selylacbes@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

 > And I bet "Viva speaking Lojban!" would be {.i'e sai lonu tavla fo la
lojban} then.

Why not take {lonu} out? It seems redundant to me.