From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 23 06:10:37 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:23:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EevKX-0002pU-O1 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:10:37 -0800 Received: from mx6.mail.ru ([194.67.23.26]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EevKV-0002pN-A8 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 06:10:37 -0800 Received: from [212.17.3.19] (port=62829 helo=yanis.vpn.plhs) by mx6.mail.ru with esmtp id 1EevKT-000AHx-00 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:10:33 +0300 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:10:29 +0600 From: Yanis Batura X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1915666744.20051123201029@mail.ru> To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Wives And Husbands Under Laws MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------11A53411620FC11" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 2670 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ybatura@mail.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------------11A53411620FC11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The current file with lujvo, NORALUJV.txt, defines the place structure of lujvo {fetspe} "wife" and {nakspe} "husband" as fetspe fetsi+speni: wife: x1 = speni1 (married) = fetsi1 (female), x2 = speni3 nakspe nakni+speni: husband: x1 = speni1 (married) = nakni1 (male), x2 = speni3 Is it correct that the second sumti is speni3, i.e. married "under law/custom/tradition/system/convention"? It is obvious that x2 = speni2 would be much more appropriate. I haven't yet studied the art of defining the lujvo place structure. Is the above a mistake? I would like to use {le fetspe be mi} for "my wife", instead of {le mi fetspe} which now is the only option left for me :) Yanis Batura Happy Learner of Lojban ------------11A53411620FC11 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The current file with lujvo, NORALUJV.txt, defines the place structure of lujvo {fetspe} "wife" and {nakspe} "husband" as


fetspe                         

fetsi+speni:  wife:   x1 = speni1 (married) = fetsi1 (female), x2 = speni3

nakspe                         

nakni+speni:  husband:   x1 = speni1 (married) = nakni1 (male), x2 = speni3


Is it correct that the second sumti is speni3, i.e. married "under law/custom/tradition/system/convention"?


It is obvious that x2 = speni2 would be much more appropriate.

I haven't yet studied the art of defining the lujvo place structure.

Is the above a mistake?


I would like to use {le fetspe be mi} for "my wife", instead of {le mi fetspe} which now is the only option left for me :)


Yanis Batura

Happy Learner of Lojban

------------11A53411620FC11--