From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Nov 29 09:46:28 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:46:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54) id 1Eh9Yi-0007sn-HH for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:46:28 -0800 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.194]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1Eh9Yd-0007sg-Nb for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:46:28 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s14so1668931wxc for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:46:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=SRSMfn2/L5vgIdAvD+sg8mDWCdKFsbmwqL8J+V+zGAxXAp7oetvWU0u/dyuq8KVu+eBY2TtxGFyPZl+QagnYP9KyDmQP8hjYn4uE6haeiixWdbJdwPTI9Ymdf4bnt9MDFPw5K5kihHIE54vlToNZFLlT1ZrPeuCQfH7syUb0Emk= Received: by 10.65.61.11 with SMTP id o11mr5690911qbk; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:46:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.72.15 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:46:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0511290946w6c3c4caaqfad9f1773be4b98b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:46:22 +0100 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: questions about questions In-Reply-To: <26506d300511290026x3e37568cm@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_71778_30690850.1133286382150" References: <26506d300511280238g762086b4o@mail.gmail.com> <2d3df92a0511280645i24310fd2ga93e5b9be94cc067@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560511281547y25fe8c93hcc71e1220ad4c82f@mail.gmail.com> <26506d300511290026x3e37568cm@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-archive-position: 2716 X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_71778_30690850.1133286382150 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline > > I don't know if I follow you here... vomo'o is meant to be a sumti, > that's why I said le vomo'o. I never meant it to be a selbri. Sumti always involve a selbri. Think of {lo dunda}, where {dunda} is the selbri, {le te preti}, where {te preti} is the selbri, {la ranjit.} where {ranjit.} is the selbri etc. vomoi is > 'fourth' as an ordinal if I remember correctly. How can vomoi stand alone= ? It can form a sumti as {lo vomoi}, and so refer to a fourth section of anything. Jorge said {vomo'o} was an indicator because... because it really was. :) It cannot be used as a sumti. I'd kinda hoped {li xo} was correct because I took it directly from > the LFB... :) :D Don't ever believe me when I happen to contradict some trustworthy document on Lojban grammar! (Really, do not. :)) mi'e darves. ------=_Part_71778_30690850.1133286382150 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
I don't know if I follow you her= e... vomo'o is meant to be a sumti,
that's why I said le vomo'o. I never= meant it to be a selbri.
 
Sumti always involve a selbri. Think of {lo dunda}, where
{dunda} is the selbri, {le te preti}, where {te preti} is the
selbri, {la ranjit.} where {ranjit.} is the selbri etc.

vomoi is
'fourth' as an ordin= al if I remember correctly. How can vomoi stand alone?
 
It can form a sumti as {lo vomoi}, and so refer to a fourth
section of anything.
Jorge said {vomo'o} was an indicator because... because
it really was. :) It cannot be used as a sumti.

I'd kinda hoped {li xo} was corr= ect because I took it directly from
the LFB... :)
 
:D
Don't ever believe me when I happen to contradict
some trustworthy document on Lojban grammar!
(Really, do not. :))
 
mi'e darves.
------=_Part_71778_30690850.1133286382150--