From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 15 10:34:32 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.54)
	id 1Emxw0-0003EC-9H
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:34:32 -0800
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.201])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1Emxvt-0003E3-Kx
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:34:32 -0800
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so416823wri
        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:34:24 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=anQnulxW89L0pkkoN9hkAZz7s5ZB5jZzuSxzJmkrJK4gLUIkgRa/2sUke9CXBYnp2JaG6OEu2vwafOvSukQNfY8sDQnzSHB5OC7Rxu9sKJrRGtGSZbGW0S0X60snZZKFiPoYs2amp7e2ZqZ0xnCXQ99vYeenznuKu6uPmZeM9cY=
Received: by 10.54.77.16 with SMTP id z16mr1570511wra;
        Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:34:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.126.1 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:34:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <925d17560512151034l63e22c0fv2d9e0fa49c7b25ac@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:34:23 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: ok, lambda/currying-geeks needed (was Re: Re: "Once More")
In-Reply-To: <1134666955.8718.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <E1Ellqb-0003Zc-00.ybatura-mail-ru@f23.mail.ru>
	 <925d17560512121409o663e2a7ekae04309af89c599a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <762741971.20051213083403@mail.ru>
	 <1134564388.5808.28.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <925d17560512141053h13e65826t1f4e53636fab6088@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1134588279.5808.58.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <925d17560512141218q4ac20542ma2b219d953ee80f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1134615224.5808.83.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <925d17560512150509k27e32655keb2597e87d445634@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1134666955.8718.9.camel@localhost.localdomain>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 2788
X-Approved-By: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

On 12/15/05, Sunnan <sunnan@handgranat.org> wrote:
> I guess I'll have to take a look at the full BNF myself one of these
> days; I keep coming up with crazy things like "tibu". (I haven't slept!
> Please forgive me.)

{tibu} is a perfectly good lerfu. I have no idea what it could be used
for though. In any case, it can't go directly in front of {re'u}, but
something like {pa tibu re'u} is grammatical, even if we never
considered what it could mean. (I think numbers should consist
of PA only, for different reasons, but that's yet anoher matter.)

> (Wait. Does that mean that I should've written mi pu terxa'a fe la
> xorxes ku.i'e ?

No, {la CMENE} does not (cannot in fact) take a terminator.

(I would rather CMENE behaved just like BRIVLA
syntactically in every respect, but currently they don't.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes