From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Dec 21 07:24:42 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:00:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ep5pZ-0007OQ-RS for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:24:41 -0800 Received: from smtp-out5.starman.ee ([85.253.0.7] helo=mx2.starman.ee) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ep5pX-0007OG-Hd for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 07:24:41 -0800 Received: from haqq.pri.ee (ip65.cab9.ltln.starman.ee [82.131.9.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0EC32C124 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:24:34 +0200 (EET) Received: (qmail 32090 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2005 17:27:07 +0200 Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: lunra From: Elmo To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <28214402.20051221205548@mail.ru> References: <28214402.20051221205548@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:27:05 +0200 Message-Id: <1135178825.28409.0.camel@haqq> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx2.starman.ee Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 2833 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: entropy@swissinfo.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2005-12-21 kell 20:55, kirjutas Yanis Batura: > I am looking at the Moon. > > {mi ca viska lo lunra} [1] > > > I suspect {le lunra} would be incorrect, in spite of the traditional > malglico equations "a = lo; the = le". > > > The question is, how to underline the fact that {lunra} is unique? > Because [1] could also mean "I am looking at moons". Certainly we do > know that there is only one natural satellite of the Earth; but is > there any way to put the load off the shoulders of context/erudition? I don't know, but I'd just say {mi ca viska la lunra} -- it solves your problem.