From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jan 05 09:07:22 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 05 Jan 2006 10:09:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EuYaA-0000pC-ND for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:07:22 -0800 Received: from nproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.182.206]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EuYa7-0000p4-Fc for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:07:22 -0800 Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y38so1235307nfb for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:06:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=g+b/T1r0hZlYXQobIf/FUDlyRtL53HHbez8tCyq0B+FAYk1lyiedxuHBCDJ3MgN0N2DlaeUzV/vtgc/2/477xkaFH8wVhnWgLX9ucCAxac7z9ovEdxYw5byrMmZyiuoU5EuXq98ghoFxzUC4Gxmut10cUq4tpskEWtkQLMy5h7I= Received: by 10.48.215.17 with SMTP id n17mr731878nfg; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:06:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.32.15 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 09:06:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 13:06:42 -0400 From: Betsemes To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: "la" questions In-Reply-To: <925d17560601041117x3b36c606wd5c02da6261ff189@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <43B59F56.1030508@bcpl.net> <925d17560601011001paebafa6kd80f4f7e25663e11@mail.gmail.com> <008601c6114d$1df5f490$a0d2400a@caroe1> <925d17560601041117x3b36c606wd5c02da6261ff189@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 2891 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: betsemes@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners > The benefit of separating CMENE from BRIVLA is that you > can say {la djan klama} instead of having to say {la djan cu klama}. > > The disadvantages are that: > - you have to learn more grammar rules. > - you have to say {la noi cmalu djan} instead of {la cmalu djan} > for "Little John". > - you have to say {lo me la makyntoc skami} instead of {lo makyntoc skami} > for "a MacIntosh computer". > - you have to say {mi me la xorxes} instead of {mi xorxes}. > > I think the disadvantages far outweigh the benefit, but that's how it > was done. Nobody has tried to refute you, so I guess you are right. And if I may say so, some of those grammatical constructs are ugly compared to the alternative ungrammatical ones. I would have preferred to have to write/say "la djan cu klama". Hmm, >>mi xorxes<<, "mi betsemes". This sounds like using cmene as brivla; something like "x1 is called/has the name ". Let me see..... mi betsemes I'm called Betsemes lo betsemes karce Betsemes' car lo betsemes a Betsemes (anyone(s) or something(s) called Betsemes) le betsemes someone(s) or something(s) I have in mind and I'm calling Betsemes la nolraitru betsemes King Betsemes (or Sovereign Betsemes) I have been wondering how to use nobility or rank titles in a name, I still have no idea. If cmene could be used this way, the usage would be straight forward. But I guess it is ; ugly, a real king would be displeased :-). le nobli je se sinma remna noi betsemes the noble and well esteemed human being called Betsemes hmmmm I should stop before someone just laughs at me. LOL This way of using cmene would make "mi'e" unnecessary. I think I like this other way much better than the chosen one. And it was just to save a single "cu"......