From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jan 23 01:39:42 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:39:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F0yAo-0005Wt-Mg for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:39:42 -0800 Received: from mx3.mail.ru ([194.67.23.149]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1F0yAl-0005Wl-Ho for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:39:42 -0800 Received: from [194.126.169.55] (port=46182 helo=1C-YANIS) by mx3.mail.ru with esmtp id 1F0yAj-000NY9-00 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:39:37 +0300 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:39:19 +0600 From: Yanis Batura X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1796839413.20060123153919@mail.ru> To: Hal Fulton Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Universal claims within a nested bridi In-Reply-To: <43D49761.5090202@hypermetrics.com> References: <1708370362.20060122105001@mail.ru> <20060123050722.GF27330@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <43D49761.5090202@hypermetrics.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 2985 X-Approved-By: ybatura@mail.ru X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ybatura@mail.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners 23.01.2006, 14:44 Hal Fulton wrote: > How would you say, "It's ironic, but I feel partially responsible > for her self-nullifying behavior" in Lojban? It was your joke, but nevertheless I have spent 20 minutes and made the translation! {di'e xajmi .i ku'i mi pagbu cinmo lo ka fuzme kei lenu ri tarti lenu sevzi nongau} By the way, why doesn't anyone answer my original question? Or is it so stupid that the only thing you can do is to laugh? mi'e .ianis.