From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jan 23 01:50:15 2006
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1F0yL1-0005e2-4F
	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:50:15 -0800
Received: from ms-smtp-02.texas.rr.com ([24.93.47.41] helo=ms-smtp-02-eri0.texas.rr.com)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hal9000@hypermetrics.com>)
	id 1F0yKw-0005do-N1
	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:50:14 -0800
Received: from hypermetrics.com (cpe-66-68-164-156.austin.res.rr.com [66.68.164.156])
	by ms-smtp-02-eri0.texas.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id k0N9o0e1000728
	for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:50:03 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <43D4A6C8.9010205@hypermetrics.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:50:00 -0600
From: Hal Fulton <hal9000@hypermetrics.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031114
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Universal claims within a nested bridi
References: <1708370362.20060122105001@mail.ru> <20060123050722.GF27330@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <43D49761.5090202@hypermetrics.com> <1796839413.20060123153919@mail.ru>
In-Reply-To: <1796839413.20060123153919@mail.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 2986
X-Approved-By: hal9000@hypermetrics.com
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: hal9000@hypermetrics.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

Yanis Batura wrote:
> 23.01.2006, 14:44 Hal Fulton wrote:
> 
>>How would you say, "It's ironic, but I feel partially responsible
>>for her self-nullifying behavior" in Lojban?
> 
> 
> It was your joke, but nevertheless I have spent 20 minutes and made the
> translation!
> 
> {di'e xajmi .i ku'i mi pagbu cinmo lo ka fuzme kei lenu ri tarti lenu
> sevzi nongau}

Haha! This came from _Wayne's World_ originally.

> By the way, why doesn't anyone answer my original question? Or is it
> so stupid that the only thing you can do is to laugh?

I don't know enough Lojban to answer. Others will answer perhaps...


Hal