From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Mar 16 07:33:21 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:14:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FJuTZ-0004bM-3m for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:33:21 -0800 Received: from srv1.rent-a-guru.de ([212.86.204.161]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FJuTV-0004bE-9u for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:33:20 -0800 Received: from A64 (p54AC2E58.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.172.46.88]) (authenticated bits=0) by srv1.rent-a-guru.de (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k2GFXDb06233537 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:33:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:33:10 +0100 From: Michael Stapelberg X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1675004324.20060316163310@stapelberg.de> To: HeliodoR Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: My first two sentences - are they correct so far? In-Reply-To: <2d3df92a0603160646v4b19553av2c3aee4574ac686@mail.gmail.com> References: <1225392006.20060314082022@stapelberg.de> <2d3df92a0603160646v4b19553av2c3aee4574ac686@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-archive-position: 3113 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: michael@stapelberg.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners coi HeliodoR. >> do zanvi'e fi le mi sezyskinoi > "(You're) Welcome to..." is expressed by the cmavla {fi'i} like this: > fi'i mixael. .i mi'e dAni,el. And zanvi'e does not fit? Or is fi'i just shorter? >> ni'i rodo facki fi le samli vrici joi so'o le zildatni fo lei mi joi >> so'o le barku'e > That {ni'i} isn't quite okay in that position. You most surely meant > {ni'o} instead. Mh, I thought that's the same subject I'm talking about. Still about my website and still the introduction? > What does **{samli} mean? I bet You intended {skami} instead. > Neither do I understand ?{zildatni}. That should've been sampli (Computer program, see http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/natlang/en/computer%20program ), sorry. Zildatni means information (see http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/natlang/en/information ). > {mi} doesn't require an article, it is a pro-sumti. So no "fei" before? I thought "fei" means "about", "some information about me"? > {barku'e}... I haven't encountered such a solution yet, but this is far > not the only case. It seems alright. OK :-). Thanks for your help, co'ho, mixael