From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Mar 17 06:39:51 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:39:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FKG7K-0006qq-H9 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:39:50 -0800 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FKG7H-0006qa-E8 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:39:50 -0800 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so616250nzf for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:39:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=fAxHxilS2My2ZiI6Wja3us+u/0A1i/Lh0J/9cwVOxnc4y3rEZQXz5doHfsu9twY0zyw5lPIBgUaMGFO/nl6EYnwaFekv+VezJ1nuIeEwWL/S80w6v9NfA7tX1XtFWNj41tKWw/lob1alr3B/wncGzGptCtYCyicmmJU3hRy7H+Q= Received: by 10.65.205.4 with SMTP id h4mr231448qbq; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:39:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.214.13 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:39:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0603170639l228b6945yc81ee6e0aa624d3b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 15:39:45 +0100 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: My first two sentences - are they correct so far? In-Reply-To: <1675004324.20060316163310@stapelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2430_16060845.1142606385886" References: <1225392006.20060314082022@stapelberg.de> <2d3df92a0603160646v4b19553av2c3aee4574ac686@mail.gmail.com> <1675004324.20060316163310@stapelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 3114 X-Approved-By: exitconsole@gmail.com X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_2430_16060845.1142606385886 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline > > And zanvi'e does not fit? Or is fi'i just shorter? It is more popular and better understood - I think. Mh, I thought that's the same subject I'm talking about. Still about > my website and still the introduction? Then what is the {ni'i} for? {ni'i} is "because of...". > {mi} doesn't require an article, it is a pro-sumti. > So no "fei" before? I thought "fei" means "about", "some information > about me"? You wrote {lei mi} which should simply be {mi}. co'ho, > mixael That sounds like You said goodbye to Yourself. :) {co'o mi'e mixael.} means "Bye, this is Michael", or - practically - "Bye! Michael". ------=_Part_2430_16060845.1142606385886 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
And zanvi'e does not fit? Or is = fi'i just shorter?
 
It is more popular and better understood - I think.

Mh, I thought that's the same su= bject I'm talking about. Still about
my website and still the introducti= on?=20
 
Then what is the {ni'i} for? {ni'i} is "because of...".
> {mi} doesn't require an art= icle, it is a pro-sumti.
So no "fei" before? I thought "f= ei" means "about", "some information=20
about me"?
 
You wrote {lei mi} which should simply be {mi}.

co'ho,
mixael
 
That sounds like You said goodbye to Yourself. :)
{co'o mi'e mixael.} means "Bye, this is Michael", or - pract= ically -
"Bye! Michael".
------=_Part_2430_16060845.1142606385886--