From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Mar 17 10:22:32 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:34:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FKJap-0002ZQ-UV for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:22:32 -0800 Received: from smtp.mail.umich.edu ([141.211.93.160] helo=skycaptain.mr.itd.umich.edu) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FKJan-0002ZF-3p for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:22:31 -0800 Received: FROM arkanoid.gpcc.itd.umich.edu (arkanoid.gpcc.itd.umich.edu [141.211.2.211]) BY skycaptain.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 441AFE63.62EB4.32372 ; 17 Mar 2006 13:22:27 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:22:27 -0500 (EST) From: Alex Joseph Martini X-X-Sender: alexjm@arkanoid.gpcc.itd.umich.edu To: HeliodoR Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: My first two sentences - are they correct so far? In-Reply-To: <296255583.20060317160431@stapelberg.de> Message-ID: References: <1225392006.20060314082022@stapelberg.de> <2d3df92a0603160646v4b19553av2c3aee4574ac686@mail.gmail.com> <1675004324.20060316163310@stapelberg.de> <2d3df92a0603170639l228b6945yc81ee6e0aa624d3b@mail.gmail.com> <296255583.20060317160431@stapelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 3118 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: alexjm@umich.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners to de'i li 2006 pi'e 03 pi'e 17 la mixael ciska toi > [ li'o ] > The definition of zildatni is: > > x1=d1 is information gathered/produced by method/from source x2=d3 > It acts as a gloss word. > see: http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/natlang/en/information > > So how would I use this now normally? le zildatni mi? I would think that {le zildatni be mi} would work. If you think backward, you could way {ko'a zildatni mi} if you had already defined {ko'a} as 'this webpage', so this would be the right internal sumti. Lesson 9 in Lojban for Beginners discusses internal sumti: http://ptolemy.tlg.uci.edu/~opoudjis/lojbanbrochure/lessons/less9.html > >>> co'ho, >>> mixael > [ li'o ] > > co'o mi'e mixael > mu'omi'e .aleks.