From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Mar 26 07:58:15 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:58:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FNXd9-0000je-4L for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:58:15 -0800 Received: from smtp.mail.umich.edu ([141.211.93.161] helo=tombraider.mr.itd.umich.edu) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FNXd6-0000jV-R8 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:58:14 -0800 Received: FROM galaxian.gpcc.itd.umich.edu (galaxian.gpcc.itd.umich.edu [141.211.2.217]) BY tombraider.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 4426BA12.2400A.14282 ; 26 Mar 2006 10:58:10 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:58:10 -0500 (EST) From: Alex Joseph Martini X-X-Sender: alexjm@galaxian.gpcc.itd.umich.edu To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: no'i and ni'o in Alice's Adventures in Wonderland In-Reply-To: <925d17560603260724k3c397a0bhbac341baa09f5cfc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <3D3EBE7E-37F1-4BB9-84BD-AC459A3D07A1@umich.edu> <925d17560603260724k3c397a0bhbac341baa09f5cfc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 3138 X-Approved-By: alexjm@umich.edu X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: alexjm@umich.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, xorxes wrote: > On 3/25/06, Alex Joseph Martini wrote: >> I would >> have expected {ni'o}'s where the translation uses {no'i}'s. Why is it >> done this way? > > I don't recall using {no'i} in the translation much if at all. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > Perhaps this version is out of date? I'm looking at http://www.lojban.org/texts/translations/alice/alice.html which says it was generated September 2005. ki'e mi'umi'e .aleks.