From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 12 15:26:15 2006
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 12 May 2006 15:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.61)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1Feg5P-0006O4-23	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:26:15 -0700
Received: from eastrmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.240.34])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.61)	(envelope-from <lojbab@lojban.org>)	id 1Feg5M-0006Nv-FT	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 12 May 2006 15:26:14 -0700
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [24.250.99.39]) by eastrmmtao05.cox.net          (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP          id <20060512222609.GZZP26910.eastrmmtao05.cox.net@[127.0.0.1]>          for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>;          Fri, 12 May 2006 18:26:09 -0400
Message-ID: <44650B7B.7020103@lojban.org>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:26:03 -0400
From: Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: rafsi and FAhA's
References: <20060512154703.29965.qmail@web36410.mail.mud.yahoo.com>	 <Pine.LNX.4.63.0605121144350.25396@hive.cec.wustl.edu>	 <4464CB49.70803@lojban.org> <925d17560605121156o3bf22c1bpc58e42bade36cf57@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <925d17560605121156o3bf22c1bpc58e42bade36cf57@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 3200
X-Approved-By: lojbab@lojban.org
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

Jorge Llambías wrote:
> On 5/12/06, Robert LeChevalier <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
> 
>>  The systematic
>> association of FAhA with the gismu (and the systematic use of SE+FAhA to
>> access other places of the source gismu) came in 1990-1992,
> 
> 
> I think you may be confusing FAhA and BAI. 

You are correct.  Sorry.