From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jul 11 10:36:59 2006
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1G0MAN-0006Mo-B0	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:36:59 -0700
Received: from sccrmhc15.comcast.net ([63.240.77.85])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)	(envelope-from <turnip@bcpl.net>)	id 1G0MAL-0006Mg-9d	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 10:36:59 -0700
Received: from bcpl.net (c-69-251-6-86.hsd1.md.comcast.net[69.251.6.86])          by comcast.net (sccrmhc15) with SMTP          id <2006071117365001500d45bie>; Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:36:50 +0000
Message-ID: <44B3E18B.5000006@bcpl.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:36:11 -0400
From: Michael Turniansky <turnip@bcpl.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: le pelxu ni'ablo -- The Yellow Submarine
References: <e6663d200606150656k34d45316o26e57b7554c9750a@mail.gmail.com>	 <2d3df92a0606150927y9f5a8cbve0b92326eb5a5117@mail.gmail.com>	 <200606151308.44267.phma@phma.optus.nu>	 <2d3df92a0606151021m7e11d651qa5f5b8e76641de9a@mail.gmail.com> <2d3df92a0606170713g1b058bdbif84fd1b4d480a48@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <2d3df92a0606170713g1b058bdbif84fd1b4d480a48@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
  Curious as to why you chose "co'armivytca" rather than "veljbe" (or 
veljbetca)?               --gejyspa
X-archive-position: 3410
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: turnip@bcpl.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners


HeliodoR wrote:

> Here's the lot, corrections have been made to the
> first two verses.
>  
>  
> di'e selme'e lu
> lo pelxu ni'ablo
> li'u
>
> lo mi co'armivytca
> cu se xabju lo blopre
> .i ri skicu le nunji'e
> pe lo ni'arblotu'a
>
> .i co'ablo fa'a la sol.
> vi lo xamsi poi crino
> .i xabju ni'a loi boxna
> vi le pelxu ni'ablo
>
> .i ro pendo cu selbloti
> .i za'u ri xabju lo jibni
> .i co'agi'e le bende
>
> .i ma'a ca friliji'e
> gi'e na cautcu zo'e
> .i tanbla .ije xascrino
> vi le pelxu ni'ablo
>  
>  
> Ambiguity pushed to the extreme in the penultimate
> line, but anyway, I couldn't come up with a better
> solution. I'm also a little uncertain about {za'u ri}.
> None of the linestarter {.i}'s is to be stressed!