From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jul 23 11:58:59 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:58:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1G4jAJ-0006g0-0f for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:58:59 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1G4jAH-0006fr-Ty for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:58:58 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id m19so1228218nfc for ; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:58:56 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HjBgEOXVfR1VTSq/+DmpfGN5KFwklKOrkSC2soWmv59nnWFQE4IaSfqplL6uEJkExgpeRPODJ91rieOr208z9Meib+s2A2pCTch34YfNtoDE/XA9PpgdJ7yHd9ZN8Qf4JaYZT4I3R/UHltCU1iWJgx6cAPH90qiCa9hWvmDTN14= Received: by 10.78.195.9 with SMTP id s9mr1200256huf; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.100.6 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 11:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 14:58:56 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org, lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Meet with the Michigan Group online In-Reply-To: <44C3AF1A.1050300@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44C3A86D.3090900@gmx.net> <44C3AF1A.1050300@gmx.net> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 3447 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners I have Skype. The only reason I suggested Teamspeak is that I've been on a Lojban conference call before using that software, last year, and was told it was better than Skype when it comes to 3+ callers. I don't know how many to expect other than my group, you, and Alex. All the members of my local group will be present at my house, sharing a microphone. -epkat On 7/23/06, Torsten Schlabach wrote: > Well, does it have to be TeamSpeak? > > Didn't I see an annoncement on Skype.com recently that they allow > conference calls now? This would also feature video. Or just plain old > NetMeeting? > > How many people would we be expecting? > > Regards, > Torsten > > Matt Arnold schrieb: > > I've just realized that Teamspeak requires one user to set up their > > computer as a Teamspeak server. Servers tend to be fairly tough for > > me, but I'll look into it. If anyone else would like to volunteer to > > run the server, that would be appreciated. > > -epkat > > > > On 7/23/06, Torsten Schlabach wrote: > > > >> Hi! > >> > >> I should be able to install it. Haven't heared of it before, but I > >> presume it does not impose any too special requirements? > >> > >> But I have to state that I am interested in Lojban. I had browsed the > >> book and I had listened to your Podcasts, but I wouldn't be able to say > >> a simple sentence myself due to lack of practice. > >> > >> So depending on the format of the meeting, I might join, but I'd > >> probably listen only. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Torsten > >> > >> Matt Arnold schrieb: > >> > Who has Teamspeak-- or can install it-- and would like to have an > >> > internet conference call with the Michigan Lojbanists on Wednesday, > >> > July 26? We meet from 7 to 11 PM Eastern Standard Time. > >> > -epkat > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >