From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jul 30 15:35:12 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1G7JsO-0005Hx-Cy for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:35:12 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1G7JsO-0005Hq-3f for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:35:12 -0700 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:35:12 -0700 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: FW: lojban talks! (fwd) Message-ID: <20060730223511.GH28137@chain.digitalkingdom.org> References: <44CA7C31.9070107@bcpl.net> <200607282049.45563.phma@phma.optus.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3460 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners What happened to doing machinima? -Robin On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 01:20:09AM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > The local group watched Love and Plutonium at our meeting on > Wednesday. It was about as good as a high school play; the acting, > pacing, music, costumes, and sets would have to have been at least a > little bit professional to outweigh the negative of the poor script. > But these factors were all embarrassingly bad and would have reflected > poorly on Lojban to be the only film associated with the language. So, > ultimately we decided not to translate Love and Plutonium. We intend > to watch Call of Cthulhu at our next meeting to determine its > appropriateness for translation. > -epkat > > On 7/28/06, Pierre Abbat wrote: > >On Friday 28 July 2006 17:05, Michael Turniansky wrote: > >> There are approximately 1300 different words here (see enclosed > >> list). No attempts at data massaging have been made other than > >> collapsing plurals/present tense verb forms in a mechanical manner. > >> Total time to do this in MUMPS: <10 minutes > > > >Suggestions and words already coined for some of these words: > >arrest: {flakavbu}, in one sense; {sisti}, in another. > >allergic: {se srebandu}. > >angel: {angeli}. > >constitutional: {sera'a le cmufla}. > >fructose: {rutsakta}. > >garofalo: If it's what I think it is, it's {kriofla}. > >mandrake: Is it the same as {mandragora}? > >slug: I've thought of {cakcau cakcurnu} or {cakcau skargolu}, but there > >ought > >to be a single word for this. > >thrombosis: {blujge}. > > > >phma > > > > > > > > > > > -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/