From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Aug 15 06:55:23 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:55:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GCzO7-0005ro-LK for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:55:23 -0700 Received: from express.cec.wustl.edu ([128.252.21.16]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GCzO4-0005rg-Pe for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 06:55:23 -0700 Received: from hive.cec.wustl.edu (hive.cec.wustl.edu [128.252.21.14]) by express.cec.wustl.edu (8.13.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id k7FDtIZb008411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:55:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from hive.cec.wustl.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hive.cec.wustl.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k7FDtIIg002121; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:55:18 -0500 Received: from localhost (adam@localhost) by hive.cec.wustl.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id k7FDtIi0002118; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:55:18 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: hive.cec.wustl.edu: adam owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:55:18 -0500 (CDT) From: "Adam D. Lopresto" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: end of text-cmavo In-Reply-To: <2d3df92a0608141159q2b68eb29n6173582198a59921@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <44E0BB23.8050905@freenet.de> <2d3df92a0608141159q2b68eb29n6173582198a59921@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 3508 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adam@pubcrawler.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, HeliodoR wrote: >> >> .i le ninmu poi se prami mi pu cliva gi'e .au baza se klama mi > > > A "cu" is needed after the relative clause: > le ninmu poi se prami mi cu pu cliva ... No it isn't. It's allowed, but you don't need it. >> I have read that {fe'o} is used for "The Email is >> over"; but isn't {mu'o} appropriate? > > The use of {fe'o} isn't restricted to emails. It can also > mean the "The End" at the end of a text, for example. > You can also see lots of {mu'o}'s used in emails on > this list. Yeah, most usage has settled on {mu'o} for the end of an email, with {fe'o} being the end of a conversation. -- Adam Lopresto http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/ I may be weird now, but I'm saving up to be eccentric.