From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Aug 15 11:00:37 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GD3DQ-00038r-P1 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:00:36 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GD3DO-00038i-I0 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:00:36 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x30so403175nfb for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:00:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=WAs7XVJWjU8sB7OPE1acsSmRjHEZ8akcgUg1P9Q+e8N9qCIYAlVKc0M5ukPhF6tDIs1xNF7pB34feJTTaXO2xx5uHbbysQOjmwOvNiRhCoZeBtP8I1g4t/lX9v/1YzpJJAsRp6vdBR28nLtGJFia/8Eg6SLqYaVqvXkZEZgYaCo= Received: by 10.49.8.10 with SMTP id l10mr1646085nfi; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.80.4 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 11:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2d3df92a0608151100r703994fof0d7fb1e29279344@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 20:00:31 +0200 From: HeliodoR To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: end of text-cmavo In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_92599_20621551.1155664831907" References: <44E0BB23.8050905@freenet.de> <2d3df92a0608141159q2b68eb29n6173582198a59921@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-archive-position: 3509 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: exitconsole@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners ------=_Part_92599_20621551.1155664831907 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline > > > A "cu" is needed after the relative clause: > > le ninmu poi se prami mi cu pu cliva ... > > No it isn't. It's allowed, but you don't need it. But without any termination the {pu} will belong to the relative clause. Grammatical it is, but not the same as with {cu}. (Correct me if I'm wrong.) mi'e darves ------=_Part_92599_20621551.1155664831907 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
> A "cu" is needed after the relative clause:
> le ninmu poi se prami mi cu pu cliva ...

No it isn't.  It's allowed, but you don't need it.
 
But without any termination the {pu} will belong to
the relative clause.
Grammatical it is, but not the same as with {cu}.
(Correct me if I'm wrong.)
 
mi'e darves
------=_Part_92599_20621551.1155664831907--