From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Aug 30 04:56:21 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:56:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GIOg9-0005CI-1K for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:56:21 -0700 Received: from imo-m26.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.7]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GIOg7-0005CA-Vx for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:56:20 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m26.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id d.c52.1030f4d (39331) for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:56:09 -0400 (EDT) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:56:09 EDT Subject: [lojban-beginners] Today I am creating ... To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_c52.1030f4d.3226d6d9_boundary" X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-archive-position: 3547 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --part1_c52.1030f4d.3226d6d9_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 8/30/2006 4:22:41 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > > But to put them together in a predictable way, I'm confused. > > finti doesn't have an selbri for when the creation occurs, so I > > wouldn't know where to put la cabdei in the phrase "mi finti la > > carni". > > ca le cabdei > > -Robin > Or more completely: ca le cabdei mi finti le carni or mi ca le cabdei cu finti le carni or mi finti ca le cabdei le carni or mi finti le carni ca le cabdei Basically it can go anywhere, as long as it's terminated properly so that it doesn't interfere with the other phrases. Is there a difference in topicality or emphasis in each version above? stevo --part1_c52.1030f4d.3226d6d9_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 8/30/2006 4:22:4= 1 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


> But to put them togeth= er in a predictable way, I'm confused.
> finti doesn't have an selbri for when the creation occurs, so I
> wouldn't know where to put la cabdei in the phrase "mi finti la
> carni".

ca le cabdei

-Robin


Or more completely:=20
ca le cabdei mi finti le carni
or=20
mi ca le cabdei cu finti le carni
or
mi finti ca le cabdei le carni
or=20
mi finti le carni ca le cabdei

Basically it can go anywhere, as long as it's terminated properly so tha= t it doesn't interfere with the other phrases.
Is there a difference in topicality or emphasis in each version above?

stevo --part1_c52.1030f4d.3226d6d9_boundary--