From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Sep 21 06:23:57 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GQOWy-0007GS-Sc for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:23:57 -0700 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.229]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GQOWw-0007GK-5A for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:23:56 -0700 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 55so332599wri for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:23:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VDB19BsMu0Gatx11xmxM1A8RhsEJQEDeBw6V91RWiFGYUz+4bRrDncAKR2/WqPU/e/jaAGHQfxdN6qbvK9Gb5jn9SPwDugJMtAasuWOvmCdIlPezzgh9rwg77+kUCMP+dgGATjXplwP+eubcfnfls1fIq8h7EgYDMhcpIzFRbPY= Received: by 10.90.100.6 with SMTP id x6mr7232687agb; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.55.6 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 06:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:23:52 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Lojban in Google. In-Reply-To: <6fdb45540609210144xeff9e63g50da58e62d4b3415@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6fdb45540609210144xeff9e63g50da58e62d4b3415@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 3589 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners That sounds good. Thanks for taking point on this! However, I caution you that the fact that some Lojbanists are computer professionals makes them very picky about what Lojban words to use for computer terminology such as "link", "click", and "internet". So it will not be a quick and simple task. -epkat On 9/21/06, Michael wrote: > Hello guys. > As you all know Google is one of the most wide spread internet companies, > which is availibly in most spoken, and some not realy spoken languages. > The "Hacker", "Ewmew Fudd" etc. are available for fun (and no special > necessity). > Constructed languages include Esperanto and Klingon. I've filed a > request on public translators GoogleGroup > (http://groups.google.com/group/google.public.translators?lnk=lr) to > include Lojbanic interface > (http://groups.google.com/group/google.public.translators/browse_thread/thread/389b87690a542aa3/e3b403a72886d476#e3b403a72886d476). > If you want visit it, rate it, reply to it or otherwise show support > and interest, may be one day {la gugl. lojbo} will be available:). > Thanks. > > > >