From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 01 08:55:16 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:55:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GqBfQ-0007Oz-Fa for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:55:16 -0800 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GqBfJ-0007Oe-2N for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:55:16 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so2275914uge for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:55:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=r9uZbQuO6LqOW1Lisb4j4xXVIjZAO7rxSesC2hE76jcn5mRbAzQ2EZAKcVzCpk66NjUb4Cq5cHfVGZQJVbsUVmHawQGhKBMBp1UZF9gwnZ0ztXbwXrjkV5ziCqhFaOIKyAjjpgkggVrFjviePga6SwlfAk2ZiLf2ZuOLxPkjFgE= Received: by 10.78.164.13 with SMTP id m13mr5002528hue.1164992107068; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:55:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.144.3 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 08:55:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:55:07 -0500 From: "Matt Arnold" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: minor misunderstanding of JSK In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45705277.6030700@perpetuum-immobile.de> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 3746 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 12/1/06, Betsemes wrote: > On 12/1/06, Timo Paulssen wrote: > > > This means that both > > > right and wrong reviews will get mixed up without any means to comment > > > and/or challenge the reviews. Anyone should have the opportunity to > > > post comments on any review and the translator should have the option > > > to challenge the review while explaining why is he/she doing the > > > challenging. Since jboselkei in it's current form does not provide for > > > this, then it mixes up right and wrong reviews indiscriminately, > > > making it an unreliable source of learning material. > > > > you can of course always look at the Value of a review, which is > > calculated from the score of the user that did the review. > > I have thought on this, but it seems to me that the score has some > degree of uncertainty about the value of the review. That uncertainty > does not live up to my standards. > > > > I regarded such an implementation to be top priority over anything > > > else, I went eagerly to see what changes were made. Boy, I was so > > > disappointed. The looks and feel of the game seemed to be top priority > > > rather than improving it's usefulness as a learning tool. > > > > well, actually i was only called to action by eppcott because he had a > > design that he wanted to be implemented and i did just that... > > and basically i have to apologise for my dukse lazni ness, but part of > > it is caused by my disliking of the uglyness of PHP. > > OK Who has the skills and desire to upgrade jboselkei to give these features? Can jsk be rewritten in a language other than PHP? Why must we assume jsk will be abandoned instead of improved? -Eppcott