From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 01 17:35:20 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:35:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GqJmi-0004Mf-DL for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:35:20 -0800 Received: from mx.211.ru ([193.238.131.194]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GqJmd-0004MS-Hu for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:35:20 -0800 Received: from localhost (mx.211.ru [193.238.131.194]) by mx.211.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id E541FEBCBB for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 07:35:12 +0600 (NOVT) Received: from mx.211.ru ([193.238.131.194]) by localhost (mx.211.ru [193.238.131.194]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90463-01 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 07:35:11 +0600 (NOVT) Received: from mail.211.ru (mail [10.5.1.2]) by mx.211.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55891EBCBA for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 07:35:11 +0600 (NOVT) Received: from localhost (host-102-2-129.211.ru [10.102.2.129]) by mail.211.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A395C19 for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 07:35:10 +0600 (NOVT) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 07:35:07 +0600 From: Yanis Batura X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <132855313.20061202073507@mail.ru> To: Matt Arnold Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: minor misunderstanding of JSK In-Reply-To: References: <45705277.6030700@perpetuum-immobile.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 3753 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ybatura@mail.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 01.12.2006, 22:55, Matt Arnold wrote: > Who has the skills and desire to upgrade jboselkei to give these > features? Can jsk be rewritten in a language other than PHP? Why must > we assume jsk will be abandoned instead of improved? > -Eppcott The changes in gameplay required to make jsk *really* interesting, are not expressed in {stika}. They are, of course, {galfi} :) So I think if anyone creates a new online translation (game/database), it will not be an improved jsk. mi'e .ianis