From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 08 01:03:03 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:03:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GsbdA-0007wp-BM for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:02:58 -0800 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.224]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Gsbco-0007qm-Cs for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:02:53 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so1235567wxd for ; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:02:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iII1j+Q+/V5c2HUII5/UUTLlwD20OzbmthhKpOmwhju3VatnVdozIjnleJPChkckxAxjJDz0nfUdrSv4j7aSo0W/n6Db6aJeFOhN9rChn7JFvMiInlCWYAZbenzkdN9VP0cJTDcWzwFVS/KRjKbDxIt0NfbDS/oB4v1Pt+maEmU= Received: by 10.90.115.9 with SMTP id n9mr3694932agc.1165568553341; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:02:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.98.13 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 01:02:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <537d06d00612080102v4b8193cewb85358c443068528@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 10:02:33 +0100 From: "Philip Newton" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Interaction of {na} and {su'o} In-Reply-To: <925d17560612071151s4ab97e0bvf666cbb99dfd9f45@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <537d06d00612071116i5f7c265wd9a26f4e7d79a1f0@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560612071151s4ab97e0bvf666cbb99dfd9f45@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 3827 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: philip.newton@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 12/7/06, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 12/7/06, Philip Newton wrote: > > Would that mean that {ro danlu na xarju} and/or {naku ro danlu cu > > xarju} and/or {naku zo'u ro danlu cu xarju} would be better? > > I prefer {me'i ro} for the "not all" quantifier, so: {me'i ro danlu cu xarju} Ah, that cleverly avoids the problem with negation. Thanks. Would one or more of the suggestions I made be possible, too? (Or does that depend on which school of thought one subscribes to?) mu'o mi'e .filip. -- Philip Newton