From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jan 25 04:31:02 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:31:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HA3ks-0004x3-5x for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:31:02 -0800 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.191]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HA3kj-0004wR-2w for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:31:01 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so1616210nfb for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:30:51 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=p9LMHLwt5VFp6BCWbDKmLGLcV80bQh92ooPyg6B/7Nyy65EMymIIjmuyMKo8JroGoLwS+c7KwV0bO4qBYmvn+vWCpQqXqedoRLzDkMzJjaPKEDFl3dthFnCAFzS5ALUgRtPBQ+06FwqYZQTKGzQwZsXrNX/YBWTJKdne7fhLwSw= Received: by 10.49.8.15 with SMTP id l15mr4231606nfi.1169728250614; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:30:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.9.8 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:30:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560701250430t4feb5448t56ae8da4b9b0d658@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:30:50 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: POM: the Princess puts her foot down In-Reply-To: <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4021D41E8@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200701242300.49129.phma@phma.optus.nu> <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4021D41E8@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 3960 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 1/25/07, Turniansky, Michael wrote: > Would "mi viska le cukta be fa naku" effectively the same meaning as > "mi na viska le cukta"? Or is it more ill-defined? It would be {mi viska le na cukta}. {naku} is negating the selbri {cukta} because of {be}. {fa} doesn't do anything there. > I didn't realize that nu broda was a selbri. Fascinating. So I could say > things like "la UAtrlus nu la naPOleon jamna terji'a"? Cool. Right. (Except there seems to be no reason to base those names on the English pronunciation.) mu'o mi'e xorxes