From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Mar 15 05:26:14 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HRp26-00032C-7K for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:26:14 -0700 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HRp21-000324-Vc for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:26:13 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 32so309137ugm for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:26:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gprjOJ2sHjxpX0GLeAUTZlfUG+4XT+rWm89b5KIdCSWa0cTNCAZn9Ry7JuvlHy0AQD7O4+P8kedS3S39FpX5LXGHq+pM3aDetutzRmgjfR0u9BoiFu1isOnX2J2mvkb2LIwEo8KOujt2uGW1jYdWOWFR2qoqH8BIu6yrZd1EU7U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uJul8cCmJ3tWkc1+74g7yqrpqSXcJ/FtqIROUo59M3G9sn6Ercn2e+oOBNvLR1ghuQivP+H+c0P0MzqGdXND3IODtgAIFmTxuceWGt3A92ZdPFUUGRi07htTN+rw0l5HTs/G3OnCZUpQYi81TlbXp+ugpWrXe6c6SyA+DjEd+oo= Received: by 10.78.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr316375huf.1173961563978; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.50.10 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 05:26:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23dc8c770703150526w6ff4eb7fld8cecfd4aa965389@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 12:26:03 +0000 From: "Karl Naylor" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: spofu pemci In-Reply-To: <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7C1C@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <23dc8c770703150502i49f6b79fpcea80ee350928d8b@mail.gmail.com> <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7C1C@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 4132 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: karl.org@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 15/03/07, Turniansky, Michael wrote: > Where would you stick that ku? (What are terminating? There is no > LE/LA until the fourth line) Hmm, I was thinking that "ki'u ku" would work similarly to "ca ku", but I do tend to forget that tenses used this way are not exactly sumti tcita (although they look enough like them to confuse me a lot). If a {ku} is not permitted, then what is the sense of this? As far as I can see, {ki'u} is a sumti tcita but there is no sumti to follow it; the sentence jumps directly to the selbri: .iki'u banzu je banzu je banzu