From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Mar 15 07:36:16 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HRr3o-0003bF-I1 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:36:16 -0700 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.246]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HRr39-0001UZ-Q2 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:35:55 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b8so167236ana for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:35:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TRP6LV+NaCIqTrxBldMALFDsGHyfmypDIz7Yx/W7allABgbGczQaol4V5UaY/+qIVmVGmgmeZcSkgyjpSOsl+Joa6zwzoPMFrVo4+z+gOYpyfyj+EXYcKXCA+nKIr7+qa+++9JhmJuMwpVdgRFR7dkZAE265+lMmJcKgYfdUJgI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JA+GLwP8Xu2olic8t0AmDl/tQnMWE2+L/Tq5ogxSjq81eHzqduprPuB780vlBq8jbdh5KgIQXUWVArbBnkDR/IeIV+ZtyqoCTRvK4ojVm5SA7pvyOaiEkAFyKUkCuzgG0s9qUlsX6D+wPu0NuB/7wdzIdv7rQ9Wrxbg3SjEDX60= Received: by 10.100.33.14 with SMTP id g14mr472243ang.1173969319899; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:35:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.42.16 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:35:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560703150735gc19cbear949637e8b3464e6e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:35:19 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: spofu pemci In-Reply-To: <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7C1D@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560703150620x297841e3o4e0ce5e7651c72fa@mail.gmail.com> <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7C1D@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 4135 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 3/15/07, Turniansky, Michael wrote: > You are, of course, correct. What do you feel about this version? > mi dansu je dansu je dansu > .i dansu je sanga je gleki > ki'u le nu banzu je banzu je banzu > fa lemi jdini co cteki > > (thereby making a ki'u place of "dansu je sange je gleki" and making > "banzu..." into the event sumti explaining it? (although for metrical > reasons, I would probably drop one "banzu je") How about making use of the x2 of {gleki}? mi dansu je dansu je dansu .i dansu je sanga je gleki lo nu lo mi jdini cu banzu lo nu mo'u pleji lo cteki mu'o mi'e xorxes