From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Mar 19 05:44:05 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HTHDY-0004hT-AZ for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:44:05 -0700 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.240]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HTHDP-0004h9-Vx for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:44:03 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b8so1090549ana for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:43:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NKxjubNOPfyyWEJEc4k8wb9FBU4yx0eWfz7wW2DL9AbqXtcz5v5IaH9nX53EAFiFMrP7qiuHZyKZyxt/8vQKv2XpqXMsIC4HGNyVbs3MWZmcmdiG+Fo9n5jGwHIO4296gtgyFvpaGTCm7fVQrD4Occnk7jwTrHEuQkPBrX4WkO8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bJwbsUs2kmswITkc5ECmozBOvFiuMsckWL9q6yOz/b9OL7/qrF8X/qWM3Tji91fg1ef/t2veRh/17MRZXx1bBc2WXvFg7CAIOkOjouw9UPhoTxHbpgt/xUs8LCAtI9ho1CtO4ekDsaazuGi8hv88n5ksw4OsfU2MiOPvCoRv61w= Received: by 10.100.164.14 with SMTP id m14mr3625372ane.1174308233372; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.42.16 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 05:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560703190543g299de24dx3a941536a137dcec@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:43:53 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Debug my propaganda? In-Reply-To: <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7C2C@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <23dc8c770703181044x6bfd7f92j47c328163974e17a@mail.gmail.com> <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7C2C@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 4167 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 3/19/07, Turniansky, Michael wrote: > > --- > >.ije mi ca ka'e casnu so'o sampu bau ly. > > Ungrammatical as it stands (I like to run everything I send out > through jbofi'e to make sure it at least passes that level of processing > (although jbofi'e will give a false negative on some constructions, as > it likes a bit more "ku"s than are strictly necessary). "ije"=>".ijebo" {.ije} by itself should be fine there. If jbofi'e requires {bo}, then that's a bug. {bo} is required with tags used as connectives: {.i bo}, or {.i je bo}, but with {.i je} it would only be required to make binding tighter. mu'o mi'e xorxes