From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Mar 19 06:55:24 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HTIKY-0006Xe-Tv for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:55:24 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HTIKQ-0006XQ-Hr for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:55:21 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so1840872nfb for ; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:55:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RJzJH0wFp7BtCJQNmoVxDPyzL8Um5eq1EzFpGZXsPNh1t6YNIF6cAikkvGYOLrq5cEto4ClGPUZdfGlQj5YBpiodwmnbNFHWZ89AcJk4l4mjdkqUJGsAADtqbhb3DpTTchk67bVM5fHzkx7sCXrm9Hlu0p+s8QBBthl21PJ5gYo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AcLPkDX7xdkgJ8HMfNEnAeGlWUbBwdgN8vegIKCbUln+76nwkuSNH/nybq+Mt/Wgwr6ESGeo7dKMAveE41su7Tbfkjk9rzaatdalGEigkupyJm/F4zjHkqLviwv2jSSXYsUwMiD3TNPLSbG2eHYe0RiRzEnayKtlkvHgERbaH44= Received: by 10.78.150.7 with SMTP id x7mr2421289hud.1174312512100; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:55:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.50.10 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 06:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23dc8c770703190655r2eed9326s6192c6debeebba2b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:55:11 +0000 From: "Karl Naylor" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Debug my propaganda? In-Reply-To: <925d17560703190559x4b5b4422l2460726f6d5785df@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <23dc8c770703181044x6bfd7f92j47c328163974e17a@mail.gmail.com> <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7C2C@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> <23dc8c770703190452x453a53bcy41c34e42353ba3dc@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560703190559x4b5b4422l2460726f6d5785df@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 4171 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: karl.org@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 19/03/07, Jorge Llambías wrote: > {le ro do} is also a valid sumti without outer quantifier, so > Michael's suggestion also works. How does this work? I'm quite certain {le do} is ungrammatical since {le} requires a selbri, so how does the insertion of {ro} change this?