From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Apr 19 16:25:17 2007
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1Heg04-0004Yc-Pw	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:25:17 -0700
Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.235])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <adamgarrigus@gmail.com>)	id 1Heg01-0004YV-8n	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:25:16 -0700
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so570504nze        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=beta;        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;        b=mkujsbv8z5oM3FezlfYDD1AS5Bia9tay9q7jZHMuRnZIxzFRCI66AypI7/9cdEkC/spk7+tBk7iV/fAGM4B4C0qTROFSXf8CV/VoFIB7TyaRdlkMM7T3n7AvBLOeoRH+yf4LGsL1Rf5NJkBboI89m/rFjiyM66y/D5gg8+9dLM8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=beta;        h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth;        b=IhMFr86DJu35n3Mdo1uy1nZIEsx9TkEGHmwwVnendkgqlF2w38Z9x8I2X/T4AlMGSR4B7/Bpb5ThB0+RZRj2uiOpF+wY6mVCTDdPAdA5Y/5EMOBpyrWaF0smLBJCU853kPYGqdv0IGq39Hf2mrLge5E02gwEefY0axiJY7nmpNY=
Received: by 10.114.159.1 with SMTP id h1mr956037wae.1177025111413;        Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.109.5 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <12d58c160704191625u5402c151jfabbca0c4cf086a2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 19:25:11 -0400
From: "komfo,amonan" <komfoamonan@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Please review # 001
In-Reply-To: <641139.61316.qm@web88009.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_74739_481308.1177025111271"
References: <641139.61316.qm@web88009.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: c4305769ef09b63c
X-Spam-Score: -2.0
X-Spam-Score-Int: -19
X-Spam-Bar: --
X-archive-position: 4321
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: komfoamonan@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

------=_Part_74739_481308.1177025111271
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 4/19/07, ANDREW PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> But why {...tezu'e lenu penmi le ctuca be ri} as opposed to {...tezu'e
> lenu penmi le ri ctuca
> }?


{ le ri ctuca } expands to { le ctuca pe ri }. { le ctuca be ri } is more
precise, as it picks up the x2 of {ctuca}. I agree with filip that the gismu
places should be used whenever possible. mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

------=_Part_74739_481308.1177025111271
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 4/19/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">ANDREW PIEKARSKI</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:totus@rogers.com">totus@rogers.com</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
But why {...tezu&#39;e lenu penmi le ctuca be ri} as opposed to {...tezu&#39;e lenu penmi le ri ctuca<br>}?</blockquote><div><br>{ le ri ctuca } expands to { le ctuca pe ri }. { le ctuca be ri } is more precise, as it picks up the x2 of {ctuca}. I agree with filip that the gismu places should be used whenever possible. mu&#39;o mi&#39;e komfo,amonan
<br></div><br></div><br>

------=_Part_74739_481308.1177025111271--