From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Apr 23 09:04:36 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:04:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hg11o-0000sp-5h for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:04:36 -0700 Received: from web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.191]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hg11d-0000sP-Ol for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:04:35 -0700 Received: (qmail 82697 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Apr 2007 16:04:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=5wf4FbtZoPO1jz84dquK7u1P3DIBvYNUky6k4zITv5SYxR2k16TBtuh9Dmny/bTW9p0VOfKCQNEqAg5g8D6yuBG3LoCkZvcS7JV3AilEeYlqIhZxxnL/lWSvvAgpNhvBRVMLnHrWqrXkut+SqR1pXVbIYM2bUFfW/Y4OL/rCIyE=; X-YMail-OSG: PtKAENoVM1lCOSnNzQT9ftFED8PVjupDKBFuWMngxy9onfHQRM34IGXdDLbsMFZhbsk4ZbnVM0a4i_sdJIOd21Zry3LdNI1b.j6SJIl6W7nz5jqrOt9uyQ-- Received: from [74.96.97.233] by web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:04:19 PDT Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:04:19 -0700 (PDT) From: ANDREW PIEKARSKI Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Please review #002 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-715220346-1177344259=:79769" Message-ID: <98383.79769.qm@web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 X-Spam-Score-Int: -16 X-Spam-Bar: - X-archive-position: 4378 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: totus@rogers.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners --0-715220346-1177344259=:79769 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Thanks for the suggestion. I will use jbfi'e. However please bear in mind that for a non-linguist non-mathematician etc etc, jbofi'e output can sometimes be difficult or impossible to interpret. mu'o ni'e .andrus. ----- Original Message ---- From: "komfo,amonan" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:54:45 AM Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Please review #002 On 4/23/07, Turniansky, Michael wrote: Komfo: I would suggest running every composition through jboski or jbofi'e. When I was a beginner, a few months of doing that completely cured me of "rookie" mistakes like missing {cu}, dropping abstractions, & the like. mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan If that was addressed to me, komfo,amonan, I usually do. I was particularly rushed on Friday, to get home. (As far as the rest goes, I wanted to change Andrew's existing words as little as possible) It was addressed to Andrew. jbofi'e was hugely beneficial to me in my newbitude, and I just wanted to pass that along. mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan --0-715220346-1177344259=:79769 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ascii

Thanks for the suggestion. I will use jbfi'e. However please bear in mind that for a non-linguist non-mathematician etc etc, jbofi'e output can sometimes be difficult or impossible to interpret.

mu'o ni'e .andrus.

----- Original Message ----
From: "komfo,amonan" <komfoamonan@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 11:54:45 AM
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Please review #002

On 4/23/07, Turniansky, Michael <MICHAEL.A.TURNIANSKY@saic.com> wrote:

Komfo:

I would suggest running every composition through jboski or jbofi'e. When I was a beginner, a few months of doing that completely cured me of "rookie" mistakes like missing {cu}, dropping abstractions, & the like.
mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

If that was addressed to me, komfo,amonan, I usually do. I was particularly rushed on Friday, to get home. (As far as the rest goes, I wanted to change Andrew's existing words as little as possible)

It was addressed to Andrew. jbofi'e was hugely beneficial to me in my newbitude, and I just wanted to pass that along.

mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan

--0-715220346-1177344259=:79769--