From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Apr 23 10:33:42 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hg2Q1-0003SH-Fm for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:33:42 -0700 Received: from mclmx.mail.saic.com ([149.8.64.10]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hg2Pv-0003S5-Lf for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 10:33:40 -0700 Received: from 0015-its-ieg01.mail.saic.com ([149.8.64.21] [149.8.64.21]) by mclmx.mail.saic.com id BT-MMP-73315 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:33:15 -0400 Received: from 0015-its-exbh02.us.saic.com ([10.43.229.22]) by 0015-its-ieg01.mail.saic.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.5.66) with SMTP id M2007042313331406501 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:33:14 -0400 Received: from 0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com ([10.75.0.188]) by 0015-its-exbh02.us.saic.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:33:15 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Please review #003 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:33:15 -0400 Message-Id: <1189A858F8918F43BE3F9C7603C73FB4031E7CC6@0456-its-exmp01.us.saic.com> In-Reply-To: <218848.81775.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [lojban-beginners] Re: Please review #003 Thread-Index: AceFzN8TI9oE5fNNSEWui6TAGrfI5QAABxPw From: "Turniansky, Michael" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Apr 2007 17:33:15.0934 (UTC) FILETIME=[79AA43E0:01C785CD] X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 4391 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MICHAEL.A.TURNIANSKY@saic.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners (Hopefully you've by now seen my answer, that because of its grammatical class, which is the same as the emotions (ui, etc.), it has to pass the test of "would the sentence still work without the word?". In this case, ".i do mutce melbi mi nelcu'a le do menli" is not grammatical, whereas ".i do mutce melbi .i mi nelcu'a le do menli" is (You are very beautiful. I prefer your mind).) --gy -----Original Message----- From: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org [mailto:lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org] On Behalf Of ANDREW PIEKARSKI Sent: Monday, April 23, 2007 1:26 PM To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Please review #003 What I meant was, why do I need {.i} before {ku'i} in ".i le do se pensi traji loka ce'u pluja .i do mutce melbi ku'i mi nelcu'a le do menli" as Pierre suggested? mu'o mi'e .andrus.