From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon May 21 10:52:11 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 21 May 2007 10:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HqC3G-0001BS-1r for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 10:52:10 -0700 Received: from smtp1.isgenesis.com ([168.215.170.6] helo=isgenesis.com) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HqC39-0001BI-1V for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 10:52:09 -0700 Received: from [168.215.170.1] (HELO [10.0.48.253]) by isgenesis.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.5) with ESMTP id 2561907 for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:51:59 -0500 Message-ID: <4651DC3F.8080803@spamcop.net> Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:51:59 -0500 From: Charles Duffy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070511) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: jboclidju status References: <1179759958.4651b5567db6f@ssl0.ovh.net> <4651CC49.3090409@perpetuum-immobile.de> In-Reply-To: <4651CC49.3090409@perpetuum-immobile.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 3.3 X-Spam-Score-Int: 33 X-Spam-Bar: +++ X-archive-position: 4583 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: cduffy@spamcop.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners My favored stack is Python/TurboGears/SQLAlchemy/Genshi. I'm not opposed on principal to learning Django (though I prefer the many-small-tools approach), but it adds overhead wrt the amount of time needed to generate useful contributions. That said, I'm overloaded already, so I couldn't guarantee substantial contributions even were the toolkit exactly what I'm already familiar with; should things lighten up, OTOH, I'll keep your project in mind as something to look into. (BTW, I hit a stack trace trying to browse as an AnonymousUser; apparently, there's a call to AnonymousUser.is_staff, which isn't defined for that class, from jboclidju/exercises/models.py:52. Is your revision control repository publicly available? If so, are you using a distributed SCM such that folks can start their own, separately-hosted branches for any development they might do? As opportunities to contribute go, fixing that kind of low-hanging bug seem like a good way to get an introduction to the codebase -- or at least its general layout).