From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 24 13:27:55 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrJub-0003BW-7G for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:27:54 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrJua-0003BP-4i for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:27:52 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:27:52 -0700 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: dicussions about basic vocabulary Message-ID: <20070524202752.GW7871@digitalkingdom.org> References: <1180024504.4655beb8a97fc@ssl0.ovh.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1180024504.4655beb8a97fc@ssl0.ovh.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 4648 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:35:04PM +0200, m.kornig@sondal.net wrote: > Maybe a standard "imposed" dictionary of (say 10000) common > everyday words could solve this dilemma? First would should *have* 10 thousand words at all, don't you think? -Robin