From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu May 24 13:51:50 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Thu, 24 May 2007 13:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrKHl-0003UW-DK for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:51:49 -0700 Received: from 25.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.37.103]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrKHi-0003UP-QU for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Thu, 24 May 2007 13:51:49 -0700 Received: (qmail 29342 invoked by uid 503); 24 May 2007 20:49:53 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 24 May 2007 20:49:53 -0000 Received: from gw2.ovh.net (HELO mail78.ha.ovh.net) (213.251.189.202) by 25.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 24 May 2007 20:49:53 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 24 May 2007 20:51:48 -0000 Received: from 40.102-225-89.dsl.completel.net (40.102-225-89.dsl.completel.net [89.225.102.40]) by ssl0.ovh.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Thu, 24 May 2007 22:51:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1180039908.4655fae484cfb@ssl0.ovh.net> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:51:48 +0200 From: m.kornig@sondal.net To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: dicussions about basic vocabulary References: <1180024504.4655beb8a97fc@ssl0.ovh.net> <20070524202752.GW7871@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20070524202752.GW7871@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Originating-IP: 89.225.102.40 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: 6 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 4649 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: m.kornig@sondal.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Sorry, Robin. I don't see what you mean. Selon Robin Lee Powell : > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:35:04PM +0200, m.kornig@sondal.net wrote: > > Maybe a standard "imposed" dictionary of (say 10000) common > > everyday words could solve this dilemma? > > First would should *have* 10 thousand words at all, don't you think?