From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 25 10:22:55 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 25 May 2007 10:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrdV7-0004kc-W3 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 10:22:54 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrdV7-0004kV-AE for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 10:22:53 -0700 Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 10:22:53 -0700 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: BPFK Taskmaster Message-ID: <20070525172252.GD7871@digitalkingdom.org> References: <135789.36781.qm@web88015.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <135789.36781.qm@web88015.mail.re2.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 4671 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:05:36AM -0700, ANDREW PIEKARSKI wrote: > coi rodo > > I clicked on the link below to find out more about BPFK processes. > My questions is: Is this still a valid statement? I'm not sure what that means, but if it means "Does the BPFK still exist, and is it still important to Lojban?" the answer is *YES*, the BPFK is the most important undertaking in the Lojban community today. > There are a lots of question marks after the names of board > members. That's a side effect of the wiki software: a page link with no referent gets a ?. Having said that, a lot of BPFK members don't actually do much; we're always looking for skilled (or at least semi-skilled) Lojbanists who don't mind doing a little work to join our ranks. > Also, what about the section on Baseline Compliance? Still valid. > When, some months ago I asked about this with reference to the > lojban texts, I was told that the compliance procedures are > unrealistic (at least that was my understanding). I have no idea what that means or who told you, so a I can't really comment in detail. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/