From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri May 25 14:17:55 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Fri, 25 May 2007 14:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrhAY-0000ek-8D for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 14:17:54 -0700 Received: from web88008.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.195]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrhAU-0000eO-Vk for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Fri, 25 May 2007 14:17:53 -0700 Received: (qmail 42422 invoked by uid 60001); 25 May 2007 21:17:44 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=C8sHaaqBl0BJ7ieXP08WKQTwW2p4ohCN35EmyqO6b1Brxe7T83j50clWCTA/G2ApqiFjCV9VYbRFIQCJAV0r5DkEwr5YVypBo6r72QmjW6PHUpEy4EOzfRHwKCxD+AnU1oL7G2025VrmrV/XVqT/b1X36S93WmEdk8u7fwpWuUQ=; X-YMail-OSG: PD96KQYVM1nSxITXbh5JvBfubuj.2J09j9.AB31XHM5rFzcTyvUJPJbOgpAs7g6RlC2zxOEl_s0okM0cMa.LQ2rg Received: from [74.123.21.51] by web88008.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2007 14:17:44 PDT Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:17:44 -0700 (PDT) From: ANDREW PIEKARSKI Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: BPFK Taskmaster To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Message-ID: <351279.40196.qm@web88008.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: 1.9 X-Spam-Score-Int: 19 X-Spam-Bar: + X-archive-position: 4683 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: totus@rogers.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners >From this exchange, I understand that no texts have been reviewed or declared compliant by the committee. If some have, then they should be declared as such. Beginners will feel more comfortable knowing that the text they are studying has gone through the process. mu'o mi'e .andrus. ----- Original Message ---- From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 3:39:14 PM Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: BPFK Taskmaster On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:15:29PM -0400, Matt Arnold wrote: > On 5/25/07, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > >On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:05:36AM -0700, ANDREW PIEKARSKI wrote: > >> When, some months ago I asked about this with reference to the > >> lojban texts, I was told that the compliance procedures are > >> unrealistic (at least that was my understanding). > > > >I have no idea what that means or who told you, so a I can't > >really comment in detail. > > Andrew is referring to the email exchange he and I had. He > originally wanted to be pointed to some texts written in Lojban > that were officially approved as correct examples from which to > learn. One of my responses to this request was that the Logical > Language Group officially approves textbooks and other materials, > but does not provide official approvals on canonical texts written > in Lojban about something other than how to learn Lojban. Technically not true: Following the formal declaration of the baseline, the LLG Board will assign a committee, probably a rump form of the byfy, with the task of supporting baseline compliance. Any person or group who creates a text in Lojban, or who writes or translates language description materials or language teaching materials in any language, may submit that effort to the committee for review; the committee may also choose to review an effort on its own without formal submission. That's from http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=Official+Baseline+Statement&bl However, we need to finish the cmavo before we can even contemplate declaring baseline. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/