From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat May 26 09:43:22 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 26 May 2007 09:43:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrzMC-0005ux-T1 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 26 May 2007 09:43:12 -0700 Received: from 25.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.37.103]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HrzLa-0005tl-Se for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sat, 26 May 2007 09:42:41 -0700 Received: (qmail 5610 invoked by uid 503); 26 May 2007 16:40:14 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 26 May 2007 16:40:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail79.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 25.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 26 May 2007 16:40:14 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 26 May 2007 16:42:28 -0000 Received: from 83.40-225-89.dsl.completel.net (83.40-225-89.dsl.completel.net [89.225.40.83]) by ssl0.ovh.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sat, 26 May 2007 18:42:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1180197748.46586374b33be@ssl0.ovh.net> Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 18:42:28 +0200 From: m.kornig@sondal.net To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: my first Lojban words 1.1 References: <1180122807.46573eb7554e4@ssl0.ovh.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Originating-IP: 89.225.40.83 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: 6 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 4702 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: m.kornig@sondal.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Hi Alex, Selon Alex Martini : > On May 25, 2007, at 3:53 PM, m.kornig@sondal.net wrote: > > > ...document type declaration > > (XHTML 1.0 Strict). > > ki'e (but I'm a self declared sucker for standards compliant > documents...) I'm not sure whether I understand. You like it? Or you don't like it? > I would suggest that you ought to use Unicode (UTF8 or UTF16, not > sure which > would be better) for this. Latin-1 really doesn't include those > Japanese characters you're > using, so you're probably depending on the browser to fall back on > another > encoding. Which is probably either Shift JIS or some Unicode anyhow. What is so bad about relying on browser fall backs? Currently, I use a simple text editor (it's actually bloc-notes) to create my HTML files. Can I still use this if I go for UTF8 or UTF16? And will the Japanese characters be distinguishable in the source file? How and where do I specify UTF8 or UTF16? Martin