From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Jun 02 12:48:19 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HuZaE-0007bV-35 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:48:18 -0700 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.240]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HuZaB-0007UP-3t for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:48:17 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b21so260260ana for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:48:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BxxfXiGDLXnv+EreYv20XM4H4pzcddLNgYJOIKdtiIGPYE5PjAWsa2NifgD6xKKaadiQ8xnxVZscVblv4aaf/iOb6lzkIk/tr/vFBz458HmuNkHkT21dfiw98R4NT9fEm7cxP1Xm68+E83KPFl3yRsy4TUtGE0mgEOYmzDGJfzg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fR8+v7DCXJiA73zFAudk7aCTq6TTvVLMgH9wMXJSuJ7QxhgtMFbvDLJ6wenlsgPAS7ENthlaBaQZaAF/Ojqv90MIcdk6WgBYlzGehTPaVceuNNHi581fnWax/QVoEJWi7/eJ2T17FyOtAHfvD2PahAuIcQJl6B1wNtSrlXhxOj4= Received: by 10.100.171.16 with SMTP id t16mr1758703ane.1180813688699; Sat, 02 Jun 2007 12:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.42.12 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 12:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560706021248m394ea6d4sab69b28462d05cda@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 16:48:08 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: {ce'u} In-Reply-To: <2f91285f0706021129i45aef9bape50fa1350d444428@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2f91285f0706020855x9eecf9bjbfbd5f66fe24b716@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560706020958y2b7b58bdlc6037205025e5c57@mail.gmail.com> <2f91285f0706021129i45aef9bape50fa1350d444428@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 4823 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 6/2/07, Vid Sintef wrote: > In the exercise there's this sentence > { le ka ce'u simsa la arnold.cfartseneger. kei poi ckaji mi } > and I wonder why it isn't like > { le ka ce'u simsa la arnold.cfartseneger. kei poi se ckaji mi }. > The holder of the property (le ka ...) is {mi}, so it can't be the x2 of > {ckaji}, can it? You're right, it's a mistake, the {se} should be there. mu'o mi'e xorxes