From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jun 03 16:32:34 2007
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1HuzYn-0003QC-HQ	for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:32:34 -0700
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.228])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63)	(envelope-from <picos.picos@gmail.com>)	id 1HuzYk-0003Nt-Jr	for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:32:33 -0700
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t11so950911wxc        for <lojban-beginners@lojban.org>; Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=beta;        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;        b=e29Oc5wWR+wKvyPYjVZw1tpFrw2ETt7c0X2DO+WeMqHc5CbrW3rsW4CqFPcnLVE3yEoyq4VW8mgmDs3+lMWdDTesdc1Izv3ystIZ1kLsAH8k0DG25aBTW7YKsyIgfPW2HGgIuTtur4ldz/W8JTTU7tx00ZwnwfBox15F8Xdoc8k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=beta;        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;        b=DpVkYBFMCc/EuwmzGX42hIE4nbX8XOQSZOxZGdFhkb9VyZBDUqbTwoedAQ7aU45ObvdFYS2m56W8XJga2enNE6nww5YODZYkg0ZkRmaDD05gZ9Hq0MNYWhXAIZc0TVRzuL777UbFcV0avVA3vZx6jcymRVAMrG2gxj4n8wJxEJY=
Received: by 10.70.18.11 with SMTP id 11mr6326488wxr.1180913548964;        Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.30.9 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2007 16:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2f91285f0706031632m746af05eyf0420fbf93d86663@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 00:32:28 +0100
From: "Vid Sintef" <picos.picos@gmail.com>
To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: fanva 2
In-Reply-To: <925d17560706031347o204d8923u4985b8d6bc36d76f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3955_20773733.1180913548928"
References: <2f91285f0706021536u380fc52eu611e6c6eaee1956@mail.gmail.com>	 <925d17560706030834w2eb71253l3b62f7c0f570e1fa@mail.gmail.com>	 <2f91285f0706031155n545613f6qd571845dc051e172@mail.gmail.com>	 <925d17560706031347o204d8923u4985b8d6bc36d76f@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1
X-Spam-Score-Int: 1
X-Spam-Bar: /
X-archive-position: 4846
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: picos.picos@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-beginners

------=_Part_3955_20773733.1180913548928
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

How about these:

lo lirmidju be li 1990 dekna'a ({lo} instead of {le})

le lirmijpau be li 1990 dekna'a (so that {lirmijpau} shares the same
rightmost word of the expression explained below, and which is therefore
more stylistic ...)

As for "the late 1990s":

le lecpau be li 1990 dekna'a ({lerci} can't have {li 1990 dekna'a} as its
x2, so I combined it with {pagbu}.)


mu'o mi'e vid


On 6/3/07, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No {me} in that case. Other than that, it looks fine.
>
> {lirymidju} can be {lirmidju}. The official rules even say that
> {lirymidju}
> is wrong, but that will probably change so that it will be an acceptable
> variant.
>
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>

------=_Part_3955_20773733.1180913548928
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

How about these:<br><br>lo lirmidju be li 1990 dekna&#39;a ({lo} instead of=
 {le})<br><br>le lirmijpau be li 1990 dekna&#39;a (so that {lirmijpau} shar=
es the same rightmost word of the expression explained below, and which is =
therefore more stylistic ...)
<br>
<br>As for &quot;the late 1990s&quot;:<br><br>le lecpau be li 1990 dekna&#3=
9;a ({lerci} can&#39;t have {li 1990 dekna&#39;a} as its x2, so I combined =
it with {pagbu}.)<br><br><br>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e vid<br><br><br>On 6/3/07,=20
<b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Jorge Llamb=EDas</b> &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jj=
llambias@gmail.com">jjllambias@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class=3D"=
gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"border-left:=
 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex=
;">
No {me} in that case. Other than that, it looks fine.<br><br>{lirymidju} ca=
n be {lirmidju}. The official rules even say that {lirymidju}<br>is wrong, =
but that will probably change so that it will be an acceptable<br>variant.
<br><br><br>mu&#39;o mi&#39;e xorxes<br></blockquote></div><br>

------=_Part_3955_20773733.1180913548928--