From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jun 04 12:01:30 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HvHnp-00061w-3D for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:01:18 -0700 Received: from 25.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.37.103]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HvHnk-0005y1-EO for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 12:01:16 -0700 Received: (qmail 11688 invoked by uid 503); 4 Jun 2007 19:01:00 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 04 Jun 2007 19:01:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail235.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.59) by 25.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 19:01:00 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 4 Jun 2007 19:01:05 -0000 Received: from 13.96-225-89.dsl.completel.net (13.96-225-89.dsl.completel.net [89.225.96.13]) by ssl0.ovh.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:01:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1180983665.46646171e34f1@ssl0.ovh.net> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:01:05 +0200 From: m.kornig@sondal.net To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: mp3 files: can you help? References: <1180908797.46633cfd69599@ssl0.ovh.net> <1180976193.4664444158f8a@ssl0.ovh.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Originating-IP: 89.225.96.13 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: 6 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 4867 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: m.kornig@sondal.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Selon Matt Arnold : > On 6/4/07, m.kornig@sondal.net wrote: > > > > > > Dramatic performance for numbers like "one", "two", "three"? You > > must be kidding... > > > > Does it make sense to pronounce "pa" and "mu" with a short > > vowel and the other numers with long vowels? I don't think so. > > > > Martin > > > > What I tried to do was speak each number as a separate recording, but my > girlfriend did not. She quickly counted all five numbers as one recording, > then went back to cooking herself some breakfast. When a person counts down, > they often treat the string of numbers like a sentence, vocally: start at a > higher pitch and end at a lower pitch. That's what she did. Vowel length > might go into this as well. "Dramatic performance" was not the best phrase > to describe these choices, but it was the best one I could think of at the > time. Okay, Matt. I didn't meant to critizise anybody in general and not your girlfreind in particular. I was actually thinking of Hans' recordings. Cheers, Martin