From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jun 10 13:34:50 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HxU7c-0002YC-U4 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:34:49 -0700 Received: from 25.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.37.103]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HxU7Z-0002Y4-Pd for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:34:48 -0700 Received: (qmail 471 invoked by uid 503); 10 Jun 2007 20:34:14 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 10 Jun 2007 20:34:14 -0000 Received: from b7.ovh.net (HELO mail17.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.57) by 25.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 10 Jun 2007 20:34:14 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 10 Jun 2007 20:34:32 -0000 Received: from 166.31-225-89.dsl.completel.net (166.31-225-89.dsl.completel.net [89.225.31.166]) by ssl0.ovh.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:34:32 +0200 Message-ID: <1181507672.466c6058a66c2@ssl0.ovh.net> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 22:34:32 +0200 From: m.kornig@sondal.net To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: inline sound in browser References: <1181387529.466a8b09abad4@ssl0.ovh.net> <466C0918.1080301@perpetuum-immobile.de> In-Reply-To: <466C0918.1080301@perpetuum-immobile.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Originating-IP: 89.225.31.166 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: 6 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 4934 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: m.kornig@sondal.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Selon Timo Paulssen : > m.kornig@sondal.net wrote: > > Unfortunately, the tag is not included in XHTML > > standard, I believe. And I really would like to avoid > > non XHTML features. > > > how about the iframe tag? > is it inside the XHTML 1.0 strict definition? > - Timo ifram is in XHTML 1.0 "Transitional" (another, older and less strict web standard). This might be a solution. However, there might be a reason why W3C has chosen to abolish this feature in the more recent "Strict" standard. I'll check this out... Thanks for the tip. Martin