From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jun 17 16:33:50 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I04Fh-0005nG-Hq for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:33:50 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I04Fg-0005n9-Eb for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:33:49 -0700 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 16:33:48 -0700 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: Ja.Jax vs. Ja.Jak Message-ID: <20070617233348.GF1590@digitalkingdom.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 5002 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 06:20:24PM -0400, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > In a message dated 6/17/2007 4:43:54 AM Central Daylight Time, > ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > > > > OK, continuing with my exploration of Michael Turnianski's > > translation of a passage by {La.Ja.Jax.Rusox} (is X an ok > > terminal consonant?). > > > > Yes, but so is 'k', and Ja.Jak is better than Ja.Jax. Bothe are illegal, however; . always seperates a word, and "ja" is not a name, it's a cmavo. -Robin