From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jul 18 05:31:20 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IB8gZ-0006B5-So for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:31:20 -0700 Received: from 25.mail-out.ovh.net ([213.186.37.103]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IB8gS-0006Ax-Vp for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:31:19 -0700 Received: (qmail 27525 invoked by uid 503); 18 Jul 2007 12:31:32 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 18 Jul 2007 12:31:32 -0000 Received: from b6.ovh.net (HELO mail80.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.56) by 25.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Jul 2007 12:31:32 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 18 Jul 2007 12:31:13 -0000 Received: from 211.123-225-89.dsl.completel.net (211.123-225-89.dsl.completel.net [89.225.123.211]) by ssl0.ovh.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:31:13 +0200 Message-ID: <1184761873.469e0811d35eb@ssl0.ovh.net> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:31:13 +0200 From: m.kornig@sondal.net To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: .ea .eia .e.a .oe .oue .o.e References: <925d17560707171540j57a6eef2oe5d1b8fa4eb1b201@mail.gmail.com> <1184746004.469dca14c7d9e@ssl0.ovh.net> <200707180805.37970.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: <200707180805.37970.phma@phma.optus.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6 X-Originating-IP: 89.225.123.211 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: 2 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 5230 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: m.kornig@sondal.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners Selon Pierre Abbat : > {ea} is two syllables. It is pronounced exactly like {e,a}. Okay. So you don't consider {ea} a diphthong. Is this just your personal view or is it "official"? > {o,i}, on the > other hand, is not pronounced like {oi}, but is the same word. Does this mean I can always pronounce a diphthong as two separated vowels and this would be correct? Martin