From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Aug 21 08:41:14 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1INVqz-00027q-Kl for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:41:13 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1INVqx-00027i-1n for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:41:13 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 4so834070nfv for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:41:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bJcRjnYSIg5ztHWMRMkId8VK85T3in4UODuP+fhFI3G2fNLSiJJkTxv5VK98SkSr36UH//wTZ+1++EN0A9gvpB3l37z6AQZIIAm/LlF9gV6axsGn3Zh45XfXAjHm6fGqopW4f5uMxoOGc4v/J2GXJI5mlo9BXDCIi3WcM5UN8Yo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EdQ8lACP+Ndcz3nODiSDu5+Lsc9DnsQYz51uSpezMp+DtFPhsPYK93Pni2SI2aP7Iq//av2qe6KHDWOo0vQaSIpLgayXC9aOJhKBbTBCpaD76Bch36OQHLlCn1OlLDEPtg1EbVsAjCVzVCQs0tUwcDChGtAtngo0sN1Qnb/fAhI= Received: by 10.86.70.8 with SMTP id s8mr5546258fga.1187710867668; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.27.19 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560708210841wa59d50dn6627a16caff5b90c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:41:07 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] Re: cu'e In-Reply-To: <2f91285f0708210744w17b3d8fble593967afeb50bb5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2f91285f0708210744w17b3d8fble593967afeb50bb5@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 5405 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners On 8/21/07, Vid Sintef wrote: > Is > {do bacu'e cliva} > possible by way of questioning which temporal distance (zi/za/zu) is true? I suppose, although the grammar of {cu'e} is not the same as that of ZA. I don't think {cu'e} is a very useful word. > How can I avoid the ambiguity between distance and interval which are > altogether covered by {cu'e}? I suggest {do ba cliva za ma}, {do ba cliva ze'a ma}, although the last meaning seems much more unlikely. mu'o mi'e xorxes