From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Oct 29 07:15:34 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-beginners); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:15:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ImVOw-0003jr-30 for lojban-beginners-real@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:15:34 -0700 Received: from anno.name ([81.169.186.62] helo=mail.anno.name) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1ImVOq-0003jH-Cq for lojban-beginners@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:15:33 -0700 Received: from [192.168.178.20] (p5085EAA0.dip.t-dialin.net [80.133.234.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.anno.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D825CF7E0 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:15:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4725EAF8.3080307@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:15:20 +0100 From: Timo Paulssen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070808) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-beginners@lojban.org Subject: [lojban-beginners] on quoting... References: <200710281811.OAA24625@Sparkle.Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> <2204fa080710281149y6f3c5caal9097bb5d746e1c82@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2204fa080710281149y6f3c5caal9097bb5d746e1c82@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 OpenPGP: id=21E90840 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig823B0BFC30D43EA579B8DAD8" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: 2 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 5737 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-beginners-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-beginners@lojban.org X-list: lojban-beginners This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig823B0BFC30D43EA579B8DAD8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jared Angell wrote: > On 10/28/07, *der Mouse* > wrote: >> And, on a completely different note, it would help if you could lea= rn >> and apply proper email quoting etiquiette. Every time you top-post= and >> fail to trim context (which combination seems to be your usual modu= s >> operandi) you push me closer to mentally killfiling you as someone = who >> can't be bothered to put even minimal effort into producing readabl= e >> email. >=20 > I didn't realize that there was some problem with that. > --=20 > Jared It itches me, too. And there are other people who have horrifying ways to quote and reply. God gave us mail clients that show threads as a tree or something similar, so there's no need whatsoever to include every mail in a quote, even though your answer only refers to part of it. And if it refers to the whole email itself you can just leave out the quote completely. - Timo --------------enig823B0BFC30D43EA579B8DAD8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHJer4us6NTCHpCEARAhBmAJ47671KYngNyDETq/dSGCdNK8Z7jACfQSlX KN6VV0/rMUdzN9sah+JPGB8= =UL0w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig823B0BFC30D43EA579B8DAD8--